Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 39.0 to 35.6.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.