Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #182 Confirmed

Summary

  • Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 Flash specifications
Nova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.738.8
Released2025-12-012026-04-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output64K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.19
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.13
Results tracked1913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Coding1385—
ALE-Bench—326.4

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
SimpleBench—35.2%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts1364—
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—77.1%
LMCA—31%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.26

Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—22.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
LMArena Math1359—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—10.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Too close to call

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
GPQA Diamond—83.3%
SimpleQA Verified—15.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1358—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Non-English1337—
LMArena Chinese1364—
LMArena French1381—
LMArena German1343—
LMArena Japanese1271—
LMArena Korean1284—
LMArena Russian1343—
LMArena Spanish1373—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1335—

Long Context Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1335—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Qwen3.6 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 Flash
LMArena Text1362—
LMArena Creative Writing1291—
LMArena Multi-Turn1338—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper