Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1319 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.