Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 26.1 to 20.9.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1308 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1355 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1278 |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.