Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3.6 Flash
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.6 Flash in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 52.6% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and 35.2% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.6 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.