Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1314 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1299 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.