Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Phi-4
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Phi-4 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 63.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 30.7% for Phi-4.
- Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.07 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 30.7% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1231 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 130.42 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 41.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 64.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1246 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1203 |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1212 |
| LMArena French | — | 1224 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1234 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 58.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1201 |
Long Context Phi-4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1217 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 25.6% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1182 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1206 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Phi-4?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Phi-4 better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Phi-4 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.