Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 16.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.
- Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-01-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1246 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.4% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 127.07 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1233 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1240 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 47.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 25.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1202 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1198 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1204 |
| LMArena French | — | 1203 |
| LMArena German | — | 1211 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1216 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1214 |
Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1246 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1195 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 707 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1217 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Small 3?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3 share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.