Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #278 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Small 3 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 47.3% for Mistral Small 3.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index39.131.2
Released2025-02-052025-01-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1424

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mistral Small 3: 36.5 (#207)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.3%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1246
BigCodeBench Complete—50.4%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mistral Small 3: 18.9 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06127.07
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1233
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mistral Small 3: 16.3 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1240
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mistral Small 3: 25.1 (#263)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
GPQA Diamond65.7%47.3%
Confabulations18.4%25.2%
LMArena Expert—1202

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Small 3: 37.3 (#236)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
LMArena Non-English—1198
LMArena Chinese—1204
LMArena French—1203
LMArena German—1211
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1216

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mistral Small 3: 63.7 (#229)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1214

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1246

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mistral Small 3: 32.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Small 3
LMArena Text—1234
LMArena Creative Writing—1195
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—707
LMArena Multi-Turn—1217
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Small 3?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Small 3 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper