Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 131.73 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 49.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.