Model comparison

Phi-4 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 36.3 to 20.8.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-4 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Phi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index31.239.2
Released2024-12-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.07—
Output $ / M tokens$0.14—
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 34.4 (#239), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding12311316
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LiveBench Coding30.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete55.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-4: 22.8 (#128), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.8%—
BALROG11.6%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 17.7 (#291), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts12201299
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning47.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis45.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.42—
LiveBench41.6%—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 20.8 (#285), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math12461304
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202513.8%—
LiveBench Math42%—
MATH Level 564.9%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 32.6 (#209), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert12031279
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
Confabulations29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.7%—
MMLU84.8%—

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 37.2 (#237), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English11971290
LMArena Chinese12121331
LMArena Russian12091324
LMArena French1224—
LMArena German1222—
LMArena Japanese1158—
LMArena Korean1151—
LMArena Spanish1234—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 60.4 (#251), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following12011287
LiveBench Instruction Following58.4%—

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 36.9 (#226), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query12171307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi-4: 40.5 (#244), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text12171321
LMArena Creative Writing11821328
LMArena Multi-Turn12061292
Short-Story Creative Writing62.6%—
LiveBench Language25.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi-4 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper