Google, proprietary
Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro by Google ranks 173rd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.1. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #173 of 354
- Index score
- 39.1
- Evidence
- Confirmed 14 results
- Provider
Google- Released
- February 5, 2025
- Weights
- Proprietary
- Reasoning
- Unknown
- Context window
- —
- Max output
- —
- Input price
- Not listed
- Output price
- Not listed
- Blended price
- Not listed
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- Not ranked
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 37.8
- Reasoning 22.3
- Math 39.7
- Knowledge 36.5
- Instruction Following 75.5
- Long Context 29.2
- Writing & Preference 52.7
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 37.8 | #187 | 2 |
| Reasoning | 22.3 | #198 | 3 |
| Math | 39.7 | #100 | 2 |
| Knowledge | 36.5 | #167 | 2 |
| Instruction Following | 75.5 | #59 | 1 |
| Long Context | 29.2 | #292 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 52.7 | #165 | 1 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where Gemini 2.0 Pro places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instruction Following | 75.5 | +4.3 | #59 of 305, top 20% |
| Math | 39.7 | +3.1 | #100 of 327, top 31% |
| Writing & Preference | 52.7 | −1.1 | #165 of 312, top 53% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Context | 29.2 | −11.8 | #292 of 296, top 99% |
| Reasoning | 22.3 | −1.3 | #198 of 350, top 57% |
| Coding | 37.8 | −0.9 | #187 of 340, top 56% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below Gemini 2.0 Pro. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 3b | #169 | 39.4 | — | — | Compare |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | #170 | 39.3 | $0.85 | 152 | Compare |
| Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | #171 | 39.2 | — | — | Compare |
| Qwen3 32B | #172 | 39.2 | $1.22 | 86 | Compare |
| Molmo 2 8b | #174 | 39.1 | — | — | Compare |
| Mercury 2 | #175 | 39.1 | $0.38 | — | Compare |
| Mistral Large 3 | #176 | 39.1 | $0.38 | 7 | Compare |
| GLM-4.5-Air | #177 | 38.9 | $0.43 | 160 | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | #30 of 44, top 69% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | #12 of 39, top 31% | Epoch AI |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | #36 of 38, top 95% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | #13 of 39, top 34% | Epoch AI | ||
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | #7 of 39, top 18% | Epoch AI | ||
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | #126 of 213, top 60% | Epoch AI | 2025-02-05 | |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | #11 of 39, top 29% | Epoch AI |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | #10 of 39, top 26% | Epoch AI | ||
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | #22 of 79, top 28% | Epoch AI | 2025-02-06 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | #106 of 186, top 57% | Epoch AI | 2025-02-07 | |
| Confabulations (lower is better) | 18.4% | #29 of 51, top 57% | Lech Mazur benchmarks |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | #4 of 39, top 11% | Epoch AI |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | #42 of 47, top 90% | Epoch AI |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | #16 of 39, top 42% | Epoch AI |
Compare Gemini 2.0 Pro
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3 32B
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Molmo 2 8b
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mercury 2
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Large 3
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Kimi K3
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.6
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GLM-5.3
- Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
Other Google models
Frequently asked questions
How good is Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro by Google ranks 173rd of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 39.1. Its strongest category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro open source?
No. Gemini 2.0 Pro is proprietary and available only through Google's API and partner platforms.
What are Gemini 2.0 Pro's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, Gemini 2.0 Pro places best in instruction following, math, writing & preference and lowest in long context, reasoning, coding.
What is Gemini 2.0 Pro best at?
Its best category is instruction following, where it ranks 59th on Noometry.