Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Phi-4

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 4 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 40.5.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Phi-4 specifications
Molmo 2 8bPhi-4
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index39.131.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked537

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
LMArena Coding—1231
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts12871220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
LMArena Math—1246
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Phi-4: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Vision1081—

Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Non-English12761197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12701201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query—1217

Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bPhi-4
LMArena Text12881217
LMArena Creative Writing—1182
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1206
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Phi-4?

Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Phi-4 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper