Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs o3-mini

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and o3-mini in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 60.1% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 89.6% for o3-mini.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and o3-mini specifications
Gemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index39.136.7
Released2025-02-052024-12-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1451

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
Aider Polyglot35.6%60.4%
LiveBench Coding63.5%82.7%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%89.6%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%70.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06140.34
LiveBench65.1%75.9%
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1366
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LMCA—19%
ForecastBench—59.6

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
LiveBench Math71%77.3%
MATH Level 583.5%96.5%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LMArena Math—1396
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge o3-mini leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
GPQA Diamond65.7%77%
Confabulations18.4%17.9%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
LMArena Expert—1364

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
LMArena Non-English—1319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%84.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1337

Long Context o3-mini leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Proo3-mini
LiveBench Language44.9%50.7%
LMArena Text—1337
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1320

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than o3-mini?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and o3-mini share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper