Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 39.5 to 29.2.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1312 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10% |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1316 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1360 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1284 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1308 |
Long Context Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1317 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.