Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 70.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 47.2% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-06-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1373 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 133.94 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1377 |
| DTBench | — | 62.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1373 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1373 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1404 |
| LMArena French | — | 1388 |
| LMArena German | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1367 |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 47.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1373 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1367 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1366 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.