Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen Plus
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 65.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 48.1% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen Plus?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.