Model comparison

o3-mini vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 4 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 16.3.

Side by side

o3-mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
o3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index36.739.2
Released2024-12-20—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.10—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked5112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 40.8 (#132), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13781316
Aider Polyglot60.4%—
SciCode39.8%—
GSO1.3%—
WeirdML43.7%—
LiveBench Coding82.7%—
CadEval54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o3-mini: 29.6 (#84), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
Cybench22.5%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o3-mini: 16.3 (#305), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13661299
ARC-AGI-23%—
SimpleBench22.8%—
ARC-AGI-134.5%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis70.6%—
LMCA19%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.34—
ForecastBench59.6—
LiveBench75.9%—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o3-mini: 28.1 (#244), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13961304
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202576.9%—
LiveBench Math77.3%—
MATH Level 596.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)12.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 38.3 (#146), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13641279
GPQA Diamond77%—
SimpleQA Verified15.3%—
Confabulations17.9%—

Multilingual o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 45.7 (#164), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13191290
LMArena Chinese13791331
LMArena Russian13041324
LMArena French1334—
LMArena German1303—
LMArena Japanese1286—
LMArena Korean1314—
LMArena Spanish1321—

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 75.1 (#72), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13371287
LiveBench Instruction Following84.4%—

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o3-mini: 33.8 (#256), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13431307
Fiction.LiveBench50%—

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

o3-mini: 50.3 (#182), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13371321
LMArena Creative Writing12861328
LMArena Multi-Turn13201292
Short-Story Creative Writing61.7%—
LiveBench Language50.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-mini better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o3-mini or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper