Model comparison
DBRX vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context DBRX leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.