Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama 2-13B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1062 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 106.17 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1051 |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1045 |
Long Context Llama 2-13B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1050 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama 2-13B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama 2-13B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.