Model comparison
DBRX vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 14.9.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1316 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1299 |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1304 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1279 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1287 |
Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is DBRX or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.