Model comparison

DBRX vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DBRX Databricks

29.4

Rank #311 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 35.2 to 14.9.
  • DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DBRX and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
DBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderDatabricksStepFun
Noometry Index29.439.2
Released2024-03-27—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding11321316
HumanEval+70.1%—
MBPP+55.8%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts11131299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math11451304
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert10761279
GPQA Diamond32.9%—

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English10711290
LMArena Chinese10681331
LMArena Russian10781324
LMArena French1096—
LMArena German1057—
LMArena Japanese990—
LMArena Korean993—
LMArena Spanish1064—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following11121287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11121307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDBRXStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text11191321
LMArena Creative Writing11041328
LMArena Multi-Turn11111292

Frequently asked questions

Is DBRX better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is DBRX or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DBRX and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper