Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 2 27B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 10.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 27.9% for Gemma 2 27B.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 29.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-06-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 8K |
| Max output | — | 2K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | 36% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | 47.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 122.08 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | 38.2% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1198 |
| DTBench | — | 48% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 27.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1212 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 36.5% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1172 |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1221 |
| LMArena French | — | 1247 |
| LMArena German | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | 58.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1206 |
Long Context Gemma 2 27B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1231 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | 32.6% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1224 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 2 27B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 2 27B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.