Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.3

Rank #300 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 13.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 37.5% for Claude 3 Opus and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.

Side by side

Claude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index29.338.6
Released2024-02-292025-02-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4614

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 32.4 (#261), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Coding38.6%63.5%
Aider Polyglot—35.6%
WeirdML19.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LMArena Coding1264—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+77.4%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 24.3 (#110), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
Cybench10%—
METR Time Horizons29.5%—

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 14.2 (#318), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
EnigmaEval0.8%0.7%
LiveBench Reasoning40.6%60.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%68%
Epoch Capabilities Index126.91135.06
LiveBench49.2%65.1%
SimpleBench23.5%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA17%—
ForecastBench58.4—
WinoGrande88.5%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 13.9 (#293), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Math43.6%71%
MATH Level 537.5%83.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.7%—
LMArena Math1273—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#262), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond47.2%65.7%
Confabulations22.7%18.4%
SimpleQA Verified12.6%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU84.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 26.6 (#112), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Vision1023—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Opus: 41.6 (#202), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English1258—
LMArena Chinese1248—
LMArena French1274—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1204—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1280—
LMArena Spanish1246—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 64.3 (#223), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following63.9%83.4%
LMArena Instruction Following1248—

Long Context Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#197), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
Fiction.LiveBench—41.7%
LMArena Longer Query1259—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Claude 3 Opus: 47.4 (#208), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Language50.4%44.9%
LMArena Text1262—
LMArena Creative Writing1235—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Opus better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Opus or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper