Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1235 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1220 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1233 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.