Model comparison
Olmo 3 32b Think vs Wizardlm 70b
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 34.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1081 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1079 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1093 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Wizardlm 70b?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.