Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 14.2.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderTencentAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.633.0
Released—2024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13071235

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861220

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math12811242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1276—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English12651236
LMArena Chinese13461249
LMArena Russian12661246

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following12771233

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query13411224

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text12881256
LMArena Creative Writing12641231
LMArena Multi-Turn12841252

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper