Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 39.0 to 14.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
  • Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Qwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.833.0
Released2026-04-272024-11-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.19—
Output $ / M tokens$1.13—
Results tracked1314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding—1235
ALE-Bench326.4—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
SimpleBench35.2%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220
Mystery Game Puzzles18%—
DTBench77.1%—
LMCA31%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.26—

Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.4%4.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)22.5%—
LMArena Math—1242
MATH Level 5—42.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)10.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads

Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond83.3%46.3%
SimpleQA Verified15.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following—1233

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query—1224

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Flash: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 FlashTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text—1256
LMArena Creative Writing—1231
LMArena Multi-Turn—1252

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper