Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1455 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1478 |
| LMArena French | — | 1449 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1462 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1419 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1402 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.