Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.