Model comparison

Mistral vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 16.6.

Side by side

Mistral and Qwen3 Max specifications
MistralQwen3 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.943.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding11621456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts11491448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Math11801446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
Omni-MATH7.2%—
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert11251455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English11291429
LMArena Chinese11091478
LMArena French11801449
LMArena German11551463
LMArena Japanese10131397
LMArena Korean10321399
LMArena Russian11681428
LMArena Spanish11431462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following11521419
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query11531438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3 Max
LMArena Text11651439
LMArena Creative Writing11581402
LMArena Multi-Turn11471446
WildBench66%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen3 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper