Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.5

Rank #81 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 18.0.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
MiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.529.2
Released2026-06-012024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output512K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked4112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.5 (#111), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1470—
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.5 (#121), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 29.3 (#83), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
SimpleBench45.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index147—
ForecastBench61.4—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 39.1 (#83), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1432—

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#32), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1462—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 39.5 (#45), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1254—
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 53.2 (#70), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1445—
LMArena German1424—
LMArena Japanese1381—
LMArena Korean1372—
LMArena Russian1430—
LMArena Spanish1431—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.7 (#56), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#68), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1445—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.3 (#79), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1433—
LMArena Creative Writing1405—
WildBench—68.9%
EQ-Bench 41150—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M3 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper