Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.6

Rank #80 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 18.0.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Grok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.629.2
Released2026-04-172024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1415—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1397—
DTBench90.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.13—
ForecastBench60.3—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1388—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1231—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1385—
LMArena Chinese1423—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1402—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1366—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1393—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1397—
LMArena Creative Writing1380—
WildBench—68.9%
EQ-Bench 41075—
LMArena Multi-Turn1406—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper