Model comparison
o3-pro vs Wizardlm 13b
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 32.0.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.5 (#24), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 23.8 (#171), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
o3-pro: 29.5 (#238), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 72.2 (#1), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 57.1 (#133), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is o3-pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.