Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Plus vs Wizardlm 13b

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 30.2.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Microsoft
Noometry Index42.931.4
Released2026-02-16—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$2.40—
Results tracked1510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding—1035
ALE-Bench621.92—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
Vending-Bench 20.54—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
Chess Puzzles22%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1018
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench80.5%—
LMCA36.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.78—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
LMArena Math—1017
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond84.8%—
SimpleQA Verified25.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English—1034
LMArena Chinese—1023

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following—1048

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
CL-bench19.8%—
CL-bench Life12.4%—
LMArena Longer Query—1054

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Plus: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 PlusWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text—1077
LMArena Creative Writing—1091
LMArena Multi-Turn—1047

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper