Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Wizardlm 13b
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.5 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1035 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1018 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1048 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Wizardlm 13b?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.