Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1048 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1054 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.