Model comparison
Command R vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 133× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 1 category and o3-pro in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 36.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 86.9% for o3-pro.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- o3-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | 4K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $80 |
| Results tracked | 29 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 46.4% | 86.9% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 38.5% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.42 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Command R: 28.0 (#246), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command R: 35.7 (#245), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command R: 58.1 (#261), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Command R: 36.3 (#231), o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Command R | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 133× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Command R or o3-pro?
Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.
Is Command R or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
o3-pro does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R and o3-pro share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.