Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 31.6 to 14.7.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.729.7
Released2025-03-172024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output102K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$0.56—
Results tracked2819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13091039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12781028
Chess Puzzles1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.48—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math12621089
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1257984
GPQA Diamond41.9%—
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Vision1136—

Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12551000
LMArena Chinese12531016
LMArena French12731039
LMArena German12661006
LMArena Japanese1208899
LMArena Korean1206856
LMArena Russian12631004
LMArena Spanish12831059

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12641023
IFEval75%—

Long Context Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1299996

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12771050
LMArena Creative Writing12531024
LMArena Multi-Turn1270989
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper