Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 56.0 to 51.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 35.4% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and 40.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.629.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%29.6%
LMArena Coding11121039
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%40.6%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10921028

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math11431089

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1087984

Multilingual Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10371000
LMArena Chinese10631016
LMArena Russian10601004
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10881023

Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1122996

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text10961050
LMArena Creative Writing10711024
LMArena Multi-Turn1063989

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.7 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper