Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.6 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1028 |
Math Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1089 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
Multilingual Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1023 |
Long Context Too close to call
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.