Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs phi-3-medium 14B

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 22.6 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 41.9% for Mistral Small 3.1 and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Mistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.729.7
Released2025-03-172024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output102K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$0.56—
Results tracked2813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1309—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index127.48121.23
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1278—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math phi-3-medium 14B leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—
LMArena Math1262—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond41.9%27.6%
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—
LMArena Expert1257—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1136—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1255—
LMArena Chinese1253—
LMArena French1273—
LMArena German1266—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1206—
LMArena Russian1263—
LMArena Spanish1283—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
IFEval75%—
LMArena Instruction Following1264—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1299—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1277—
LMArena Creative Writing1253—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1270—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper