Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1396 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Muse Glimmer share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.