Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen Turbo
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 36.1 to 14.5.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 26.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen Turbo?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.