Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Qwen3-1.7B
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 36.1 to 15.4.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 26.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.