Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Nemo
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Nemo?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.