Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 35.0.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
MiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.838.7
Released2026-06-01—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output512K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked4114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14691319
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14471302
SimpleBench45.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.95—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math14291316
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert14611273
GPQA Diamond90.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1253—
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14201255
LMArena Chinese14631300
LMArena French14471291
LMArena German14261290
LMArena Russian14281254
LMArena Japanese1381—
LMArena Korean1372—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14331275

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14451296

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text14331300
LMArena Creative Writing14041256
LMArena Multi-Turn14421290
EQ-Bench 41150—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M3 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper