Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 35.1.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index38.643.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1241

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding13071469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts12861447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Math12811429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert12761461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English12651420
LMArena Chinese13461463
LMArena Russian12661428
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following12771433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query13411445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M3
LMArena Text12881433
LMArena Creative Writing12641404
LMArena Multi-Turn12841442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper