Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1319 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1316 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1273 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1275 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.