Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Olmo 3 32b Think
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1318 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1302 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | 1315 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1443 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1422 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1255 |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | 1275 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.