Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 35.0.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.838.7
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding14151319
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts13961302
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math13881316
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert13851273
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13851255
LMArena Chinese14221300
LMArena French14121291
LMArena German13951290
LMArena Russian13991254
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1356—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13661275

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13931296

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text13971300
LMArena Creative Writing13801256
LMArena Multi-Turn14061290
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper