Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 46.4.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1292 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1272 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1305 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1294 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1241 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1246 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.